Skip to content

Conversation

MaxBed4d
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 13:34
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s ansible Ansible playbooks kolla workflows Workflow files have been modified labels Feb 6, 2025
@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

@MaxBed4d could you fix the merge conflict, then re-request reviews from whoever you need?

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

@MaxBed4d does this depend on any changes to DIB or our DIB elements, or is it ready to go?

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

What's the plan for consuming the aarch images? Are they just going to be pulled manually or do we need to extend the existing bifrost settings

stackhpc_overcloud_host_image_url: "{{ stackhpc_release_pulp_content_url_with_auth }}/kayobe-images/\
{{ openstack_release }}/{{ os_distribution }}/{{ os_release }}/\
{{ 'ofed/' if stackhpc_overcloud_host_image_is_ofed else '' }}\
{{ stackhpc_overcloud_host_image_version }}/\
overcloud-{{ os_distribution }}-{{ os_release }}\
{{ '-ofed' if stackhpc_overcloud_host_image_is_ofed else '' }}.qcow2"

@cityofships cityofships added the arm64 Work related to ARM architecture support label Jun 10, 2025
@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d force-pushed the aarch64-image-build branch from e2d1c70 to 763d597 Compare August 21, 2025 13:11
@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d force-pushed the aarch64-image-build branch from 004d4a0 to 9813cc7 Compare August 22, 2025 08:59
@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d force-pushed the aarch64-image-build branch from 9813cc7 to 0edc57a Compare August 22, 2025 09:23
@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d force-pushed the aarch64-image-build branch 2 times, most recently from a472a5b to ff3dd4f Compare August 22, 2025 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ansible Ansible playbooks arm64 Work related to ARM architecture support kolla size: s workflows Workflow files have been modified
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants